U.S. competitiveness in science and technology

Is the United States in danger of losing its competitive edge in science and technology (S & T)? This concern has been raised repeatedly since the end of the Cold War, most recently in a wave of reports in the mid-2000s suggesting that globalization and the growing strength of other nations in S...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Galama, Titus
Other Authors: Hosek, James R.
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Santa Monica, CA RAND Corp. 2008, 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: JSTOR Open Access Books - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 03801nam a2200529 u 4500
001 EB001842405
003 EBX01000000000000001006394
005 00000000000000.0
007 tu|||||||||||||||||||||
008 180730 r ||| eng
020 |z 0833044249 
020 |a 0833044249 
020 |z 9780833044242 
020 |a 9780833044242 
020 |a 6611736565 
020 |a 9786611736569 
020 |a 1281736562 
020 |a 9781281736567 
050 4 |a T73 
100 1 |a Galama, Titus 
245 0 0 |a U.S. competitiveness in science and technology  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c Titus Galama, James Hosek 
246 3 1 |a US competitiveness in science and technology 
260 |a Santa Monica, CA  |b RAND Corp.  |c 2008, 2008 
300 |a xxxii, 155 pages  |b illustrations 
505 0 |a Introduction -- What are the implications of the globalization of S & T and the rise of other Nations for U.S. performance in S & T? -- What evidence suggests that the United States has been underinvesting in S & T? -- Discussion and recommendations -- Appendix: Current population survey data analysis 
505 0 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 143-155) 
651 4 |a United States / fast 
653 |a BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Development / General 
653 |a BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Development / Economic Development 
653 |a BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Development / Business Development 
653 |a BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Government & Business 
653 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / Economic Policy 
653 |a Science / Study and teaching / United States 
653 |a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / General 
653 |a Competition, International 
653 |a BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Structural Adjustment 
700 1 |a Hosek, James R. 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b ZDB-39-JOA  |a JSTOR Open Access Books 
500 |a "MG-674-OSD"--Page 4 of cover. - Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002 
024 8 |a RAND/MG-674-OSD 
773 0 |t Books at JSTOR: Open Access 
776 |z 0833045253 
776 |z 9780833045256 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg674osd  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 338.973/06 
520 |a Is the United States in danger of losing its competitive edge in science and technology (S & T)? This concern has been raised repeatedly since the end of the Cold War, most recently in a wave of reports in the mid-2000s suggesting that globalization and the growing strength of other nations in S & T, coupled with inadequate U.S. investments in research and education, threaten the United States' position of leadership in S & T. Galama and Hosek examine these claims and contrast them with relevant data, including trends in research and development investment; information on the size, composition, and pay of the U.S. science and engineering workforce; and domestic and international education statistics. They find that the United States continues to lead the world in science and technology and has kept pace or grown faster than other nations on several measurements of S & T performance; that it generally benefits from the influx of foreign S & T students and workers; and that the United States will continue to benefit from the development of new technologies by other nations as long as it maintains the capability to acquire and implement such technologies. However, U.S. leadership in science and technology must not be taken for granted, and Galama and Hosek conclude with recommendations to strengthen the U.S.S & T enterprise, including measures to facilitate the immigration of highly skilled labor and improve the U.S. education system