|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
03724nam a2200457 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB001842340 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001006329 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
tu||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
180730 r ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 1282081616
|
| 020 |
|
|
|z 083304172X
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 083304172X
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 6612081619
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9786612081613
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781282081611
|
| 020 |
|
|
|z 9780833041722
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780833041722
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a TD195.A75
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Lachman, Beth E.
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a The thin green line
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b an assessment of DoD's Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative to buffer installation encroachment
|c Beth E. Lachman, Anny Wong, Susan A. Resetar
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Santa Monica, Calif.
|b RAND Corp.
|c 2007, 2007
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a xxx, 223 pages
|b color illustrations, color maps
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Includes bibliographical references and appendices
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Introduction -- Understanding the encroachment threat -- How encroachment is being addressed -- Methodology and criteria for assessing the accomplishments of the buffering activities -- Assessing accomplishments across all the buffering projects -- Findings -- Recommendations to improve military conservation buffering -- Appendix A: The importance of biodiversity -- Appendix B: An assessment of Eglin AFB's buffering activities -- Appendix C: An assessment of Fort Carson's buffering activities -- Appendix D: An assessment of Fort Stewart's buffering activities -- Appendix E: An assessment of MCAS Beaufort's buffering activities -- Appendix F: An assessment of NAS Fallon's buffering activities -- Appendix G: An assessment of NAS Whiting Field's buffering activities -- Appendix H: Background information on selected buffering projects -- Appendix I: The land price trend analysis
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a United States / Armed Forces / Environmental aspects
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a United States / fast
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Military Science
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a HISTORY / Military / Other
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / Environmental Policy
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Wong, Anny
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Resetar, Susan A.
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b ZDB-39-JOA
|a JSTOR Open Access Books
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a "Prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense."
|
| 773 |
0 |
|
|t Books at JSTOR: Open Access
|
| 776 |
|
|
|z 0833044508
|
| 776 |
|
|
|z 9780833044501
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg612osd
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 355.70973
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Over the past few decades, military installations have experienced diminishing open space near their borders from suburban sprawl and other developments. Such encroachment pressures limit the ability to conduct mission-essential testing and training. Such development can also destroy or displace native plant and animal species, the result being that military installations become islands of refuge for threatened and endangered species, which can also restrict an installation's operations. In 2003, DoD created the Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative (REPI) to help address such encroachment pressures. The REPI program helps installations implement compatible land use partnering projects with state and local governments and non-governmental organizations to protect non-military land, which helps relieve installation encroachment pressures. In this monograph, RAND researchers assessed the effectiveness of the REPI projects. The authors also identify the main causes of encroachment; detail the benefits, both to the military and local communities, of buffering areas near installations with REPI projects; and provide recommendations for how to improve REPI's effectiveness
|