|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
04626nam a2200457 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB001842331 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001006320 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
tu||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
180730 r ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|z 9780833041913
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780833041913
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9786611181123
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 1281181129
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781281181121
|
| 020 |
|
|
|z 0833041916
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0833041916
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 6611181121
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a JZ6368
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Kaye, Dalia Dassa
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Talking to the enemy
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b track two diplomacy in the Middle East and South Asia
|c Dalia Dassa Kaye
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Santa Monica, CA
|b RAND National Security Research Division
|c 2007, 2007
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a xxv, 139 pages
|b illustrations
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Expand the types of participants -- Create or strengthen institutional support and mentors for track two activities -- Localize the dialogues -- Bibliography
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Rethinking track two diplomacy -- Key issues and questions -- The state of the field -- A normative framework -- Defining track two -- Applying track two -- A regional focus -- Historical precedents -- Comparing the Middle East and South Asia -- Roles for track two dialogues -- Socialization of participating elites: creating a constituency for regional cooperation -- Filtering: making others' ideas your own -- Transmission: turning ideas into new policies -- Limits of track two dialogues -- Regional security dialogues in the Middle East -- Introduction -- Overview of dialogues -- UCLA and the Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation -- The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) -- The search for common ground -- Depaul University -- United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) -- Cooperative Monitoring Center -- Canadian-sponsored maritime activities --
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a The U.S. Geological Survey and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: regional seismic monitoring cooperation project -- European-sponsored activities -- Gulf security track two forums -- Roles -- Socialization -- Filtering -- Policy impact -- Limits -- Elites -- Domestic constraints -- The regional environment -- Conclusion -- Regional security dialogues in South Asia -- Introduction -- Overview of dialogues -- Neemrana process -- Balusa group -- Kashmir Study Group (KSG) -- Shanghai process -- Stimson Center dialogues -- CSIS meetings on nuclear risk reduction centres (NRRCs) -- Cooperative Monitoring Center, Sandia National Laboratories -- Maritime activities: the confidence and cooperation in South Asian Waters Project -- Roles -- Socialization -- Filtering -- Policy impact -- Limits -- Elites -- Domestic constraints -- Regional environment -- Conclusion -- Conclusion -- Central arguments -- Regional comparisons -- Regional lessons -- Improving track two dialogues --
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (pages 123-137)
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a POLITICAL SCIENCE / International Relations / General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Mediation, International
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Arab-Israeli conflict / 1993- / Peace
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Security, International
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b ZDB-39-JOA
|a JSTOR Open Access Books
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a RAND Corporation monograph series
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a "MG-592-NSRD"--Page 4 of cover. - Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002
|
| 024 |
8 |
|
|a RAND/MG-592-NSRD
|
| 776 |
|
|
|z 9780833042729
|
| 776 |
|
|
|z 0833042726
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg592nsrd
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 956.05/3
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Kaye (RAND) has written a thorough, thoughtful analysis of track two diplomacy in the two most difficult areas to practice this craft: South Asia and the Middle East. She includes descriptions and comments on a number of such efforts in both regions, which will be invaluable to both scholar and professional negotiators. Her discussion of the roles for track two talks--socializing elites, making others' ideas one's own, and turning ideas into policies--would be useful in any negotiation course. With respect to work in the two regions, Kaye speaks insightfully of projects under way: their potential, constraints, and the role of the regional environment. Her suggestion that each region may learn from the tribulation of the other is arguably thoughtful. Her suggestions for improvement--expand the types of participants, create institutional support and mentors, and localize the dialogues--deserve further study
|