|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02316nam a2200397 u 4500 |
001 |
EB001842114 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000001006103 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
tu||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
180730 r ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|z 9780833031938
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9780833031938
|
020 |
|
|
|z 0833031937
|
020 |
|
|
|a 0833031937
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a HD9711.5.A2
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Lorell, Mark A.
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Going global?
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b U.S. government policy and the defense aerospace industry
|c Mark A. Lorell [and others]
|
260 |
|
|
|a Santa Monica, Calif.
|b RAND, Project Air Force
|c 2002, 2002
|
300 |
|
|
|a xxxv, 215 pages
|b illustrations
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (pages 201-215)
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a The U.S. defense aerospace industry: how globalized is it? -- The globalizing aerospace industry: opportunities and challenges -- The legal, regulatory, and policy framework for aerospace industry globalization -- The new cross-border business relationships: case study findings and proposed future research -- Conclusions and proposed future research
|
653 |
|
|
|a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Military Science
|
653 |
|
|
|a International trade
|
653 |
|
|
|a BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Industries / Service
|
653 |
|
|
|a International division of labor
|
653 |
|
|
|a Aerospace industries
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b ZDB-39-JOA
|a JSTOR Open Access Books
|
500 |
|
|
|a "Prepared for the United States Air Force.". - "MR-1537-AF"--Page 4 cover
|
024 |
8 |
|
|a RAND/MR-1537-AF
|
773 |
0 |
|
|t Books at JSTOR: Open Access
|
776 |
|
|
|z 083303393X
|
776 |
|
|
|z 9780833033932
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mr1537af
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 338.4/76291
|
520 |
|
|
|a Since the end of the Cold War, a dramatic decline in overall defense authorizations has led both the U.S. aerospace industry and that of Europe to undergo extensive consolidation -- a trend that has led in turn to a significant growth in cross-border business relationships. Yet while globalization has the potential to increase competition, foster innovation, encourage fair pricing, and promote interoperability among NATO allies, it also poses potential challenges, particularly with regard to the proliferation of advanced U.S.-developed military technologies
|