|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02755nam a2200409 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB001842082 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001006071 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
tu||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
180730 r ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|z 9780833031013
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780833031013
|
| 020 |
|
|
|z 0833031015
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0833031015
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a DS486.K3347
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Tellis, Ashley J.
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Limited conflicts under the nuclear umbrella
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b Indian and Pakistani lessons from the Kargil crisis
|c Ashley J. Tellis, C. Christine Fair, Jamison Jo Medby
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Santa Monica, Calif.
|b Rand
|c 2001, 2001
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a xv, 91 pages
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Introduction -- The significance of the Kargil crisis -- Kargil: lessons learned on both sides -- Options for the future -- Conclusion: Kargil and South Asian stability
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (pages 85-91)
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a India / fast
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a India / Jammu and Kashmir / fast
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a Pakistan / fast
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a POLITICAL SCIENCE / International Relations / General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / International
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Fair, C. Christine
|e [author]
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Medby, Jamison Jo
|e [author]
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b ZDB-39-JOA
|a JSTOR Open Access Books
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a "National Security Research Division.". - Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002
|
| 024 |
8 |
|
|a RAND/MR-1450-USCA
|
| 776 |
|
|
|z 0833032291
|
| 776 |
|
|
|z 9780833032294
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mr1450usca
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 327.5491054
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This report examines the views of India and Pakistan on the significance of Pakistan's foray into the Kargil-Dras sector in a limited war that has come to be known as the "Kargil conflict." The goal of the analysis is to assess both combatants' perceptions of the crisis, with a view to evaluating the possibilities of future Kargil-like events and the implications of the lessons each country learned for stability in South Asia. The analysis is based almost exclusively on Indian and Pakistani source materials. The Kargil crisis demonstrated that even the presence of nuclear weapons might not appreciably dampen security competition between the region's largest states. However, the question remains of whether or not the Kargil war represents a foretaste of future episodes of attempted nuclear coercion if India and Pakistan believe that their nuclear capabilities provide them the immunity required to prosecute a range of military operations short of all-out war
|