Benefit reform for employment and equal opportunity in Finland

The combination of different working-age benefits, childcare costs and income taxation creates complexity, reduces work incentives and holds back employment. Major disincentives in Finland are related to tapering rules for unemployment benefits, social assistance and the housing benefit, the extende...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pareliussen, Jon
Other Authors: Hwang, Hyunjeong
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Paris OECD Publishing 2018
Series:OECD Economics Department Working Papers
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: OECD Books and Papers - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02136nma a2200253 u 4500
001 EB001841996
003 EBX01000000000000001005985
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 180718 ||| eng
100 1 |a Pareliussen, Jon 
245 0 0 |a Benefit reform for employment and equal opportunity in Finland  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c Jon, Pareliussen and Hyunjeong, Hwang 
260 |a Paris  |b OECD Publishing  |c 2018 
300 |a 39 p 
653 |a Finland 
653 |a Education 
700 1 |a Hwang, Hyunjeong 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b OECD  |a OECD Books and Papers 
490 0 |a OECD Economics Department Working Papers 
024 8 |a /10.1787/26e12903-en 
856 4 0 |a oecd-ilibrary.org  |u https://doi.org/10.1787/26e12903-en  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 370 
520 |a The combination of different working-age benefits, childcare costs and income taxation creates complexity, reduces work incentives and holds back employment. Major disincentives in Finland are related to tapering rules for unemployment benefits, social assistance and the housing benefit, the extended unemployment benefit for older workers, the childcare fee structure and the homecare allowance. Improved benefit design combined with efficient activation policies can reduce complexity and remove the strongest disincentives while minimising adverse fiscal and social impacts. Replacing current benefits with a basic income would improve incentives for many, but with a drastic redistribution of income and likely increasing poverty as a result. Merging working-age benefits with similar aims and coordinating their tapering against earnings would on the other hand consistently improve work incentives and transparency, while preserving social protection. Once the new income registry comes online, linking benefit payments to real-time incomes, combined with strengthened work incentives, would make for a truly efficient and inclusive benefit system, fit for the future of work. This Working Paper relates to the 2018 OECD Economic Survey of Finland (www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/economic-survey-finland.htm)