|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02900nam a2200289 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB001839398 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001003387 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
tu||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
180702 r ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0309391253
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780309391252
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Fostering integrity in research
|h Elektronische Ressource
|c Committee on Responsible Science, Committee on Science, Engineering, Medicine, and Public Policy, Policy and Global Affairs
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, DC
|b The National Academies Press
|c 2017, [2017]
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 PDF file (xv, 307 pages)
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Includes bibliographical references
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Scientific Misconduct
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Ethics, Institutional
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Ethics, Research
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.)
|b Committee on Responsible Science
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a Committee on Science, Engineering, Medicine, and Public Policy (U.S.)
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b NCBI
|a National Center for Biotechnology Information
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a Consensus study report
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK475953
|3 Volltext
|n NLM Bookshelf Books
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 170
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The integrity of knowledge that emerges from research is based on individual and collective adherence to core values of objectivity, honesty, openness, fairness, accountability, and stewardship. Integrity in science means that the organizations in which research is conducted encourage those involved to exemplify these values in every step of the research process. Understanding the dynamics that support -- or distort -- practices that uphold the integrity of research by all participants ensures that the research enterprise advances knowledge. The 1992 report Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process evaluated issues related to scientific responsibility and the conduct of research. It provided a valuable service in describing and analyzing a very complicated set of issues, and has served as a crucial basis for thinking about research integrity for more than two decades. However, as experience has accumulated with various forms of research misconduct, detrimental research practices, and other forms of misconduct, as subsequent empirical research has revealed more about the nature of scientific misconduct, and because technological and social changes have altered the environment in which science is conducted, it is clear that the framework established more than two decades ago needs to be updated. Responsible Science served as a valuable benchmark to set the context for this most recent analysis and to help guide the committee's thought process. Fostering Integrity in Research identifies best practices in research and recommends practical options for discouraging and addressing research misconduct and detrimental research practices
|