|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01805nma a2200241 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB001832491 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000998937 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
180616 ||| eng |
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Scrivens, Katherine
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Indicators of "Societal Progress"
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b Lessons from International Experiences
|c Katherine, Scrivens and Barbara, Iasiello
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Paris
|b OECD Publishing
|c 2010
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 66 p.
|c 21 x 29.7cm
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Economics
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Iasiello, Barbara
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b OECD
|a OECD Books and Papers
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a OECD Statistics Working Papers
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.1787/5km4k7mq49jg-en
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|a oecd-ilibrary.org
|u https://doi.org/10.1787/5km4k7mq49jg-en
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This paper looks at different experiences in the development and use of societal progress indicator sets - at the European, national and sub-national level - with the aim of identifying useful lessons from these experiences. Five case studies are presented: the indicators used to support the EU ?Lisbon Strategy?; the UK Sustainable Development indicators; Measures of Australia?s Progress; Measuring Ireland?s Progress; and an example of a local community indicator initiative - the Santa Cruz Community Assessment Programme, in California. The paper concludes that for societal progress indicators to be used and applied in decision-making processes, then three conditions need to be met. First, the indicators should be seen as legitimate by the intended users. Second, the indicators should be set within a wider system that provides =fit-for-purpose' information. Third, an appropriate incentive structure must be in place for stakeholders to act on that information
|