|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01617nma a2200229 u 4500 |
001 |
EB001832095 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000000998541 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
180616 ||| eng |
100 |
1 |
|
|a Merk, Olaf
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Shipping Emissions in Ports
|h Elektronische Ressource
|c Olaf, Merk
|
260 |
|
|
|a Paris
|b OECD Publishing
|c 2014
|
300 |
|
|
|a 37 p.
|c 21 x 29.7cm
|
653 |
|
|
|a Transport
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b OECD
|a OECD Books and Papers
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a International Transport Forum Discussion Papers
|
024 |
8 |
|
|a /10.1787/5jrw1ktc83r1-en
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|a oecd-ilibrary.org
|u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrw1ktc83r1-en
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 380
|
520 |
|
|
|a Shipping could - in one way - be considered a relatively clean transport mode. This is particularly the case if one takes the angle of emissions per tonne-kilometre. Typical ranges of CO2 efficiencies of ships are between 0 and 60 grams per tonne-kilometre, this range is 20-120 for rail transport and 80-180 for road transport (IMO 2009). There is considerable variety between vessel types and CO2 efficiency generally increases with vessel size; e.g. CO2 emissions per tonne-km (in grams per year) for a container feeder ship (with capacity up to 500 TEU) were 31.6, three times higher than the emissions for Post Panamax container ships, with a capacity larger than 4,400 TEU (Psaraftis and Kontovas, 2008). This difference is even larger for dry bulk ships, with a difference of more than a factor 10 between the smallest vessels (up to 5000 dwt) and capsize vessels (> 120,000 dwt)
|