Primary and Secondary Education in the United States

The average educational attainment of US students is weak by international comparison. For example, mean results of PISA test scores are below the OECD average. This is despite substantial resources devoted to the schooling system. One partial explanation for this is that academic standards, curricu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tulip, Peter
Other Authors: Wurzburg, Gregory
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Paris OECD Publishing 2007
Series:OECD Economics Department Working Papers
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: OECD Books and Papers - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02601nma a2200277 u 4500
001 EB001828131
003 EBX01000000000000000994577
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 180616 ||| eng
100 1 |a Tulip, Peter 
245 0 0 |a Primary and Secondary Education in the United States  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c Peter, Tulip and Gregory, Wurzburg 
246 2 1 |a L'enseignement primaire et secondaire aux États-Unis / Peter, Tulip et Gregory, Wurzburg 
246 3 1 |a L'enseignement primaire et secondaire aux États-Unis 
260 |a Paris  |b OECD Publishing  |c 2007 
300 |a 34 p.  |c 21 x 29.7cm 
653 |a Economics 
653 |a United States 
700 1 |a Wurzburg, Gregory 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b OECD  |a OECD Books and Papers 
490 0 |a OECD Economics Department Working Papers 
028 5 0 |a 10.1787/040416348662 
856 4 0 |a oecd-ilibrary.org  |u https://doi.org/10.1787/040416348662  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 330 
520 |a The average educational attainment of US students is weak by international comparison. For example, mean results of PISA test scores are below the OECD average. This is despite substantial resources devoted to the schooling system. One partial explanation for this is that academic standards, curriculum and examinations are not sufficiently challenging in most US states. In 2001, Congress enacted the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) to raise achievement levels, especially of certain groups that perform badly. The Act requires states to establish clear content standards as to what students should know, to regularly assess performance and to set thresholds for adequate yearly progress; it also requires schools where students are failing to meet such thresholds to improve or close, while enhancing options for parents of children in such schools to place their children elsewhere. The law appears to be well conceived, addressing key problems in a sensible manner. Preliminary indications are consistent with it raising school performance and closing achievement gaps. The NCLB legislation should therefore be reauthorised. Moreover, the NCLB framework of standards, assessment and accountability should be extended through upper secondary education. That said, there are a number of areas in which improvements could be made. Though the federal government cannot set standards, it could strengthen incentives for more states to make their standards more challenging. As well, the federal government should help states and districts to better test student achievement and assess progress