|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01151nma a2200229 u 4500 |
001 |
EB001826474 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000000992920 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
180616 ||| eng |
100 |
1 |
|
|a Sexton, Kimberly A.
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Crisis, criticism, change
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b Regulatory reform in the wake of nuclear accidents
|c Kimberly A., Sexton
|
260 |
|
|
|a Paris
|b OECD Publishing
|c 2016
|
300 |
|
|
|a 28 p.
|c 20 x 27cm
|
653 |
|
|
|a Nuclear Energy
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b OECD
|a OECD Books and Papers
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.1787/nuclear_law-2015-5jm22pflfts2
|
773 |
0 |
|
|t Nuclear Law Bulletin
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|a oecd-ilibrary.org
|u https://doi.org/10.1787/nuclear_law-2015-5jm22pflfts2
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 333
|
520 |
|
|
|a Accidents are a forcing function for change in the nuclear industry. While these events can shed light on needed technical safety reforms, they can also shine a light on needed regulatory system reforms. The TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant (NPP) accident in Japan is the most recent example of this phenomenon, but it is not the only one
|