Testing the Effect of Defaults on the Thermostat Settings of OECD Employees

Default options have been shown to affect behaviour in a variety of economic choice tasks, including health care and retirement savings. Less research has tested whether defaults affect behaviour in the domain of energy efficiency. This study uses data from a randomized controlled experiment in whic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brown, Zack
Other Authors: Johnstone, Nick, Haščič, Ivan, Vong, Laura
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Paris OECD Publishing 2012
Series:OECD Environment Working Papers
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: OECD Books and Papers - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02313nma a2200265 u 4500
001 EB001826399
003 EBX01000000000000000992845
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 180616 ||| eng
100 1 |a Brown, Zack 
245 0 0 |a Testing the Effect of Defaults on the Thermostat Settings of OECD Employees  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c Zack, Brown ... [et al] 
260 |a Paris  |b OECD Publishing  |c 2012 
300 |a 17 p.  |c 21 x 29.7cm 
653 |a Environment 
700 1 |a Johnstone, Nick 
700 1 |a Haščič, Ivan 
700 1 |a Vong, Laura 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b OECD  |a OECD Books and Papers 
490 0 |a OECD Environment Working Papers 
024 8 |a /10.1787/5k8xdh41r8jd-en 
856 4 0 |a oecd-ilibrary.org  |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5k8xdh41r8jd-en  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 363 
520 |a Default options have been shown to affect behaviour in a variety of economic choice tasks, including health care and retirement savings. Less research has tested whether defaults affect behaviour in the domain of energy efficiency. This study uses data from a randomized controlled experiment in which the default settings on office thermostats in an OECD office building were manipulated during the winter heating season, and employees' chosen thermostat setting observed over a 6 week period. Using difference-in-differences, panel, and censored regression models (to control for maximum allowable thermostat settings), we find that a 1°C decrease in the default caused a reduction in the chosen setting by 0.38°C on average. Sixty-five percent of this effect could be attributed to office occupant behaviour (p-value=0.044). The difference-in-differences model shows that small decreases in the default (1°) led to a greater reduction in chosen settings than large decreases (2°). We also find that office occupants who are more apt to adjust their thermostats prior to the intervention were less susceptible to the default. We find no evidence that offices with multiple occupants displayed different patterns in thermostat choices than single-occupant offices. We conclude that this kind of intervention can increase building-level energy efficiency, and discuss potential explanations and broader policy implications of our findings