|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02975nmm a2200601 u 4500 |
001 |
EB001825439 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000000991885 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
180614 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781513517087
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Banerji, Angana
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Building a Better Union
|b Incentivizing Structural Reforms in the Euro Area
|c Angana Banerji, Bergljot Barkbu, James John, Tidiane Kinda, Sergejs Saksonovs, Hanni Schoelermann, Tao Wu
|
260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2015
|
300 |
|
|
|a 41 pages
|
651 |
|
4 |
|a Germany
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor taxes
|
653 |
|
|
|a Secession
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labour; income economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Economic integration
|
653 |
|
|
|a Political Economy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Taxes
|
653 |
|
|
|a Federalism
|
653 |
|
|
|a Financial Aspects of Economic Integration
|
653 |
|
|
|a Fiscal Policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Macrostructural analysis
|
653 |
|
|
|a Exports and Imports
|
653 |
|
|
|a Fiscal policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a EU governance framework
|
653 |
|
|
|a International economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Welfare & benefit systems
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor Economics: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Institutions and the Macroeconomy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
|
653 |
|
|
|a Taxation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Intergovernmental Relations
|
653 |
|
|
|a Monetary unions
|
653 |
|
|
|a Capitalist Systems: Planning, Coordination, and Reform
|
653 |
|
|
|a Income tax
|
653 |
|
|
|a Structural reforms
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor economics
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Barkbu, Bergljot
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a John, James
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Kinda, Tidiane
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781513517087.001
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2015/201/001.2015.issue-201-en.xml?cid=43278-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
520 |
|
|
|a The momentum for structural reforms is waning in the euro area at a time when even faster progress is needed to boost productivity and growth, achieve real economic convergence, and improve the resilience of the monetary union. What can the European Union (EU) institutions do to bridge this divide? This paper argues for greater simplicity, transparency and accountability in the EU governance framework for structural reforms. Our three interrelated proposals—“outcome-based” benchmarking; better use of existing EU processes to strengthen oversight and reduce discretion; and improved financial incentives—could help advance reforms. Ex post monitoring by an independent EU-level “structural council” and ex ante policy innovation by national productivity councils could strengthen accountability and ownership. Deeper governance reforms should be considered in the medium-term with a view toward a greater EU role in promoting convergence
|