|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02269nmm a2200553 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB001825241 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000991687 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
180614 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781475579819
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a India
|b Selected Issues
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2017
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 92 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a India
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Income
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public debt
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Finance
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labour; income economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Income distribution
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Economics of Gender
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Personal income
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Non-labor Discrimination
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Debts, Public
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Long-term Capital Movements
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor markets
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Trade: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Exports and Imports
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Aggregate Factor Income Distribution
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a National accounts
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Education
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Education: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Exports
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Income inequality
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public Finance
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International Investment
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a International Monetary Fund
|b Asia and Pacific Dept
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Staff Country Reports
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781475579819.002
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2017/055/002.2017.issue-055-en.xml?cid=44671-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This Selected Issues paper evaluates corporate and banking sector vulnerabilities in India. The analysis shows that while corporate sector risks have subsided, debt repayment capacity remains strained, and high leverage continues to weigh on corporate resilience, which may pose further risks to banks’ asset quality. Public sector banks have stepped up recognition of nonperforming assets, but their debt recovery capacity remains weak. Simulations suggest that potential recapitalization needs, at current provisioning levels, should have a modest fiscal impact
|