|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02270nmm a2200253 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB001813798 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000980244 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
180415 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9789264991910
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a The Post-closure Radiological Safety Case for a Spent Fuel Repository in Sweden
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b An International Peer Review of the SKB License-application Study of March 2011
|c Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Paris
|b OECD Publishing
|c 2012
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 158 p
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Nuclear Energy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Sweden
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b OECD
|a OECD Books and Papers
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a Radioactive Waste Management
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.1787/9789264991910-en
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|a oecd-ilibrary.org
|u https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264991910-en
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 333
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Sweden is at the forefront among countries developing plans for a deep geological repository of highly radioactive waste. There is no such repository in operation yet worldwide, but Sweden, Finland and France are approaching the licensing stage. At the request of the Swedish government, the NEA organised an international peer review of the post-closure radiological safety case produced by the Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company (SKB) in support of the application for a general licence to construct and operate a spent nuclear fuel geological repository in the municipality of Östhammar. The purpose of the review was to help the Swedish government, the public and relevant organisations by providing an international reference regarding the maturity of SKB's spent fuel disposal programme vis-à-vis best practices in longterm disposal safety and radiological protection. The International Review Team (IRT) consisted of ten international specialists, who were free of conflict of interest with the SKB and brought complementary expertise to the review. This report provides the background and findings of the international peer review. The review's findings are presented at several levels of detail in order to be accessible to both specialist and nonspecialist readers
|