The politics of competence parties, public opinion and voters

Using decades of public opinion data from the US, UK, Australia, Germany and Canada, and distinguishing between three concepts - issue ownership, performance and generalised competence - Green and Jennings show how political parties come to gain or lose 'ownership' of issues, how they are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Green, Jane, Jennings, William J. (Author)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Cambridge Books Online - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02169nmm a2200289 u 4500
001 EB001651584
003 EBX01000000000000000954259
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 171005 ||| eng
020 |a 9781316662557 
050 4 |a JF2011 
100 1 |a Green, Jane 
245 0 0 |a The politics of competence  |b parties, public opinion and voters  |c Jane Green, University of Manchester, Will Jennings, University of Southampton 
260 |a Cambridge  |b Cambridge University Press  |c 2017 
300 |a xvii, 309 pages  |b digital 
505 0 |a Conceptual problems and solutions -- Concepts of issue competence -- Explaining issue ownership change -- Government performance and oppositions -- Generalised competence and the costs of governing -- Ownership, performance, generalised competence and the vote 
653 |a Political parties / Public opinion 
653 |a Party affiliation 
653 |a Government accountability 
653 |a Public opinion / Political aspects 
700 1 |a Jennings, William J.  |e [author] 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b CBO  |a Cambridge Books Online 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316662557  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 324.23 
520 |a Using decades of public opinion data from the US, UK, Australia, Germany and Canada, and distinguishing between three concepts - issue ownership, performance and generalised competence - Green and Jennings show how political parties come to gain or lose 'ownership' of issues, how they are judged on their performance in government across policy issues and how they develop a reputation for competence (or incompetence) over a period in office. Their analysis tracks the major events causing people to re-evaluate party reputations and the costs of governing which cause electorates to punish parties in power. They reveal why, when and how these movements in public opinion matter to elections. The implications are important for long-standing debates about performance and partisanship, and reveal that public opinion about party and governing competence is, to a great extent, the product of major shocks and predictable dynamics