|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02929nmm a2200685 u 4500 |
001 |
EB001309037 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000000893649 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
161223 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781475590784
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Khera, Purva
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Macroeconomic Impacts of Gender Inequality and Informality in India
|c Purva Khera
|
260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2016
|
300 |
|
|
|a 66 pages
|
651 |
|
4 |
|a India
|
653 |
|
|
|a Social discrimination & equal treatment
|
653 |
|
|
|a Migration
|
653 |
|
|
|a Women
|
653 |
|
|
|a Gender diversity
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor markets
|
653 |
|
|
|a Aggregate Labor Productivity
|
653 |
|
|
|a Gender studies, gender groups
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor
|
653 |
|
|
|a Women & girls
|
653 |
|
|
|a Informal Economy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Sex discrimination
|
653 |
|
|
|a Income Distribution
|
653 |
|
|
|a Economic Development: Human Resources
|
653 |
|
|
|a Gender Studies
|
653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Income economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Employment
|
653 |
|
|
|a Gender studies
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labour
|
653 |
|
|
|a Gender inequality
|
653 |
|
|
|a Economics of Gender
|
653 |
|
|
|a Human Development
|
653 |
|
|
|a Non-labor Discrimination
|
653 |
|
|
|a Unemployment
|
653 |
|
|
|a Demand and Supply of Labor: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Aggregate Human Capital
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor supply
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor Economics: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor market
|
653 |
|
|
|a Sex role
|
653 |
|
|
|a Underground Econom
|
653 |
|
|
|a Wages
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor Discrimination
|
653 |
|
|
|a Intergenerational Income Distribution
|
653 |
|
|
|a Women's Studies
|
653 |
|
|
|a Gender
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor economics
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781475590784.001
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2016/016/001.2016.issue-016-en.xml?cid=43687-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
520 |
|
|
|a This paper examines the macroeconomic interaction between informality and gender inequality in the labor market. A dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model is built to study the impact of gender-targeted policies on female labor force participation, female formal employment, gender wage gap, as well as on aggregate economic outcomes. The model is estimated using Bayesian techniques and Indian data. Although these policies are found to increase female labor force participation and output, lack of sufficient formal job creation due to labor market rigidities leads to an increase in unemployment and informality, and further widens gender gaps in formal employment and wages. Simultaneously implementing such policies with formal job creating policies helps remove these adverse impacts while also leading to significantly larger gains in output
|