|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02850nmm a2200541 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB001308938 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000893550 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
161223 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781498367196
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Hannan, Swarnali
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a If the Fed Acts, How Do You React? The Liftoff Effect on Capital Flows
|c Swarnali Hannan
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2015
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 39 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a United States
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Interest rates
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Short-term Capital Movements
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Currency; Foreign exchange
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Monetary economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Financial services
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Current Account Adjustment
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Balance of payments
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Long-term Capital Movements
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Monetary policy frameworks
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Exports and Imports
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Capital account
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Exchange rate stability
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Capital flows
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Foreign Exchange
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Banks and Banking
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Monetary policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Banking
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Capital movements
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Monetary Policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Money and Monetary Policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Foreign exchange
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International Investment
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Central bank policy rate
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781498367196.001
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2015/256/001.2015.issue-256-en.xml?cid=43444-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a After more than six years of ultra-low interest rates, a Fed liftoff (rate hike) is just a matter of time. This paper goes back to history to understand the spillover effect – or what is termed in the paper as the ‘liftoff’ effect – of the previous five Fed liftoffs on capital flows. Using a dynamic panel framework covering 48 countries (27 advanced economies, 21 emerging markets) over the period 1982-2006, the paper shows that the liftoff effect on capital flows (total private, portfolio) is significantly higher for emerging market economies (EM) than advanced market economies (AM). EM capital flows are hit indiscriminately one quarter before liftoff, suggesting that markets usually price in the liftoff before the actual event. Over time, there is a bit more variation among EM as policy responses/framework can to some extent dampen market reactions. The findings are similar to the unfolding of events during the taper tantrum episode indicating that, even though current circumstances are very different, history could still provide a good guidance
|