|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02507nmm a2200589 u 4500 |
001 |
EB001308359 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000000892971 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
161223 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781498372671
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Ganelli, Giovanni
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Value of WTO Trade Agreements in a New Keynesian Model
|c Giovanni Ganelli, Juha Tervala
|
260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2015
|
300 |
|
|
|a 35 pages
|
651 |
|
4 |
|a United States
|
653 |
|
|
|a Wealth
|
653 |
|
|
|a Tariff
|
653 |
|
|
|a Tariffs
|
653 |
|
|
|a Trade agreements
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labour; income economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a International Trade Organizations
|
653 |
|
|
|a Commercial treaties
|
653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Taxes
|
653 |
|
|
|a Saving
|
653 |
|
|
|a Trade Policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Trade liberalization
|
653 |
|
|
|a Open Economy Macroeconomics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Exports and Imports
|
653 |
|
|
|a International economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Demand and Supply of Labor: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a National accounts
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor supply
|
653 |
|
|
|a Commercial policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Consumption; Economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a International trade
|
653 |
|
|
|a Consumption
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor market
|
653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics: Consumption
|
653 |
|
|
|a Taxation
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Tervala, Juha
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781498372671.001
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2015/037/001.2015.issue-037-en.xml?cid=42733-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
520 |
|
|
|a We revisit the question of the quantitative benefits of WTO trade agreements in a setup that is non-standard from the traditional trade policy point of view. We show that in a New Keynesian model, unilateral trade liberalization reduces welfare due to terms-of-trade deterioration, creating an incentive for a trade agreement. For realistic parameter values, the value of an agreement, which cuts tariffs by one percentage point, is 0.5% to 2% of consumption, much larger than in trade models. The intuition for this result hinges on some New Keynesian features of our framework, such as imperfect competition and endogenous labor supply
|