|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02204nmm a2200433 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB001308313 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000892925 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
161223 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781484387818
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a da Silva Filho, Tito Nícias Teixeira
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a A Volatility and Persistence-Based Core Inflation
|c Tito Nícias Teixeira da Silva Filho
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2015
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 19 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a Brazil
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Price indexes
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Energy: Demand and Supply
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Inflation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Oil prices
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Index Numbers and Aggregation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Deflation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Expenditure
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Price Level
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a leading indicators
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Expenditures, Public
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Prices
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public Finance
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Monetary Policy
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781484387818.001
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2015/008/001.2015.issue-008-en.xml?cid=42611-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Intuitively core inflation is understood as a measure of inflation where noisy price movements are avoided. This is typically achieved by either excluding or downplaying the importance of the most volatile items. However, some of those items show high persistence, and one certainly does not want to disregard persistent price changes. The non-equivalence between volatility and (the lack of) persistence implies that when one excludes volatile items relevant information is likely to be discarded. Therefore, we propose a new type of core inflation measure, one that takes simultaneously into account both volatility and persistence. The evidence shows that such measures far outperform those based on either volatility or persistence. The latter have been advocated in the literature in recent years
|