|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02747nmm a2200565 u 4500 |
001 |
EB000936368 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000000729964 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
150128 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781498379779
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Desgranges, Gabriel
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Optimal Maturity Structure of Sovereign Debt in Situation of Near Default
|c Gabriel Desgranges, Celine Rochon
|
260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2014
|
300 |
|
|
|a 43 pages
|
653 |
|
|
|a Public debt
|
653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Hedging
|
653 |
|
|
|a Value of Firms
|
653 |
|
|
|a Expectations
|
653 |
|
|
|a Debt Management
|
653 |
|
|
|a Debts, Public
|
653 |
|
|
|a Debt
|
653 |
|
|
|a Exports and Imports
|
653 |
|
|
|a International Lending and Debt Problems
|
653 |
|
|
|a International economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Debts, External
|
653 |
|
|
|a Sovereign Debt
|
653 |
|
|
|a Debt burden
|
653 |
|
|
|a Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Financial risk management
|
653 |
|
|
|a Capital and Ownership Structure
|
653 |
|
|
|a Goodwill
|
653 |
|
|
|a Banks and Banking
|
653 |
|
|
|a Tax incentives
|
653 |
|
|
|a Financial Risk and Risk Management
|
653 |
|
|
|a Taxation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Financing Policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Public Finance
|
653 |
|
|
|a Financial services law & regulation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Speculations
|
653 |
|
|
|a Debt default
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Rochon, Celine
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781498379779.001
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2014/168/001.2014.issue-168-en.xml?cid=41913-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
520 |
|
|
|a We study the relationship between default and the maturity structure of the debt portfolio of a Sovereign, under uncertainty. The Sovereign faces a trade-off between a future costly default and a high current fiscal effort. This results into a debt crisis in case a large initial issuance of long term debt is followed by a sequence of negative macro shocks. Prior uncertainty about future fundamentals is then a source of default through its effect on long term interest rates and the optimal debt issuance. Intuitively, the Sovereign chooses a portfolio implying a risk of default because this risk generates a correlation between the future value of long term debt and future fundamentals. Long term debt serves as a hedging instrument against the risk on fundamentals. When expected fundamentals are high, the Sovereign issues a large amount of long term debt, the expected default probability increases, and so does the long term interest rate
|