|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02141nmm a2200481 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000935122 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000728718 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781451813265
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Finland
|b Staff Report for the 2005 Article IV Consultation
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2006
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 37 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a Finland
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labour
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Unemployment
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor markets
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Aggregate Labor Productivity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public employment
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Demand and Supply of Labor: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Aggregate Human Capital
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor force
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs: Public Policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor Economics: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor market
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Wages
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Economic theory
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Intergenerational Income Distribution
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Income economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Employment
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor economics
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Staff Country Reports
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451813265.002
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2006/036/002.2006.issue-036-en.xml?cid=18857-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This 2005 Article IV Consultation highlights that Finland’s economic performance in recent years continued to be favorable. Growth has outpaced that in the euro area and is expected to pick up to more than 3 percent in 2006. The external current account has remained comfortably in surplus, and inflation has remained below the euro area average. The authorities are taking some steps to address the long-term fiscal pressures. Proposals are also being debated to reform the financing of local governments and restructure their activities to raise efficiency in the provision of public services
|