|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02309nmm a2200517 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000934386 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000727982 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781451813180
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Finland
|b Staff Report for the 2003 Article IV Consultation
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2003
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 43 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a Finland
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Fiscal stance
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor taxes
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labour; income economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Social Security and Public Pensions
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Taxes
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Fiscal Policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Fiscal policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Welfare & benefit systems
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Expenditure
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Demography
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor Economics: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Expenditures, Public
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Pension reform
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Pensions
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Taxation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public Finance
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Income tax
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor economics
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Staff Country Reports
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451813180.002
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2003/325/002.2003.issue-325-en.xml?cid=16945-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The economic restructuring and expansion after the crisis reflected a combination of private sector initiative, solid macroeconomic management, including the shift from large deficits to significant surpluses of the general government, and structural reforms. High unemployment is one indication that structural rigidities continue to hamper Finland's output potential. In the face of high unemployment and rapid population aging, the discussions focused on supporting medium-term growth while securing long-term fiscal sustainability. Reflecting concerns about slowing growth, front-loaded expenditure increases, and tax cuts were at the center of the fiscal policy debate
|