|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02224nmm a2200505 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000933930 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000727526 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781451822915
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Liberia
|b Second Review of Performance Under the Staff-Monitored Program and New Program for 2007
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2007
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 58 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a Liberia
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Finance, Public
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Budget Systems
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Currency; Foreign exchange
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Monetary economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Budget planning and preparation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Budgeting
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Money
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Money supply
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Expenditure
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Foreign Exchange
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Monetary base
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Expenditures, Public
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Budget
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public financial management (PFM)
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Budgeting & financial management
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a National Budget
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public Finance
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Money and Monetary Policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Foreign exchange
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Staff Country Reports
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451822915.002
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2007/049/002.2007.issue-049-en.xml?cid=20410-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This paper discusses key findings of the Second Review Under the Staff Monitored Program (SMP) and New Program for 2007 for Liberia. Performance under the SMP in the quarter to end-September was mixed. The authorities achieved all but one of the quantitative benchmarks, but they needed more time to achieve key structural benchmarks, including the review of contracts and concessions and finalization of the domestic debt and anticorruption strategies. Most of these outstanding benchmarks have now been met
|