|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02376nmm a2200601 u 4500 |
001 |
EB000932927 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000000726523 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
150128 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781451832792
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Romania
|b Selected Issues and Statistical Appendix
|
260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2004
|
300 |
|
|
|a 98 pages
|
651 |
|
4 |
|a Romania
|
653 |
|
|
|a Finance, Public
|
653 |
|
|
|a Depository Institutions
|
653 |
|
|
|a Interest rates
|
653 |
|
|
|a Inflation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Producer prices
|
653 |
|
|
|a Public-Private Enterprises
|
653 |
|
|
|a Banks
|
653 |
|
|
|a Finance
|
653 |
|
|
|a Currency; Foreign exchange
|
653 |
|
|
|a Public Enterprises
|
653 |
|
|
|a Financial services
|
653 |
|
|
|a Deflation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Micro Finance Institutions
|
653 |
|
|
|a Exports and Imports
|
653 |
|
|
|a Arrears
|
653 |
|
|
|a Mortgages
|
653 |
|
|
|a International economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a International Lending and Debt Problems
|
653 |
|
|
|a Debts, External
|
653 |
|
|
|a External debt
|
653 |
|
|
|a Foreign Exchange
|
653 |
|
|
|a Price Level
|
653 |
|
|
|a Banks and Banking
|
653 |
|
|
|a Prices
|
653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Banking
|
653 |
|
|
|a Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects
|
653 |
|
|
|a Exchange rates
|
653 |
|
|
|a Foreign exchange
|
653 |
|
|
|a Central bank policy rate
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a International Monetary Fund
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Staff Country Reports
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451832792.002
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2004/220/002.2004.issue-220-en.xml?cid=17566-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
520 |
|
|
|a This Selected Issues paper for Romania reports that the practice of nonpayment and arrears accumulation has been widespread in Romania. Managers of enterprises that remain in the pipeline for privatization for long periods of time have little incentive to reduce arrears. The state contributed to growth of arrears by accepting nonmonetary tax and utility payments, using tax offsets in procurement, and tolerating payment arrears. These practices have been prevalent at all levels of state and local government, as well as state utility companies
|