|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02876nmm a2200553 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000931273 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000724869 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781451864205
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Balakrishnan, Ravi
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a U.S. Dollar Risk Premiums and Capital Flows
|c Ravi Balakrishnan, Volodymyr Tulin
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2006
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 27 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a United States
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Investment
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Return on investment
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Currency; Foreign exchange
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Long-term Capital Movements
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Exports and Imports
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a General Financial Markets: General (includes Measurement and Data)
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Intangible Capital
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Investments: Bonds
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Treasury bills and bonds
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Capital flows
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Foreign Exchange
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Saving and investment
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Bonds
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Investments: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Corporate bonds
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Capacity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Capital movements
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Investment & securities
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Exchange rates
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Capital
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Foreign exchange
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Government securities
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International Investment
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Tulin, Volodymyr
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451864205.001
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2006/160/001.2006.issue-160-en.xml?cid=19382-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This paper sheds light on the attractiveness of U.S. assets by studying dollar risk premiums, calculated using Consensus exchange rate forecasts, and linking them to bilateral capital flows. The paper finds that the presence of negative dollar risk premiums (i.e. expectations of a dollar depreciation net of interest rate effects) amid record capital inflows could suggest that investors may favor U.S. assets for structural reasons. One possible explanation could be that the Asian crisis created a large pool of savings searching for relatively riskless investment opportunities, which were provided by deep, liquid, and innovative U.S. financial markets with robust investor protection. Moreover, the continued attractiveness of U.S. financial markets to European investors suggests that they offer a large array of assets, with different risk/return characteristics, that facilitate the structuring of diversified investment portfolios. Looking forward, this suggests that the allocative efficiency of U.S. financial markets could mitigate risks of a disorderly unwinding of global current account imbalances
|