|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02196nmm a2200481 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000931261 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000724857 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781451863147
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Husain, Aasim
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a To Peg or Not to Peg
|b A Template for Assessing the Nobler
|c Aasim Husain
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2006
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 29 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a Pakistan
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Government and the Monetary System
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Inflation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Payment Systems
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Monetary economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Currency; Foreign exchange
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Regimes
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Deflation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Exchange rate adjustments
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Money
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Price Level
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Foreign Exchange
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Standards
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Exchange rate flexibility
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Currencies
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Monetary Systems
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Prices
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Exchange rates
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Money and Monetary Policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Foreign exchange
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451863147.001
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2006/054/001.2006.issue-054-en.xml?cid=18893-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This paper proposes a template for assessing whether or not a country's economic and financial characteristics make it an appropriate candidate for a pegged exchange rate regime. The template employs quantifiable measures of attributes-trade orientation, financial integration, economic diversification, macroeconomic stabilization, credibility, and "fear-offloating" type effects-that have been identified in the literature as key potential determinants of regime choice. To illustrate, the template is applied to Kazakhstan and Pakistan. The results indicate a fairly strong case against a pegged regime in Pakistan. The implications for Kazakhstan are mixed, although changes in that economy in recent years strengthen the case against a peg
|