|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02545nmm a2200613 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000931142 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000724738 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781451806922
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Canada
|b Selected Issues
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2000
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 60 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a Canada
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public debt
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Finance
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labour; income economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Taxes
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Debt Management
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Debts, Public
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Capital and Total Factor Productivity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Cost
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Industrial productivity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Production
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Debt
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Corporations; Taxation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Unemployment
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Total factor productivity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Corporate income tax
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Sovereign Debt
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Business Taxes and Subsidies
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Income tax systems
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Corporate & business tax
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Corporate Taxation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Capacity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Taxation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public Finance
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Income tax
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Production and Operations Management
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Staff Country Reports
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451806922.002
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2000/034/002.2000.issue-034-en.xml?cid=3453-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The issue of productivity growth in Canada has received considerable attention reflecting its marked slowdown since the early 1970s and concerns about its implications for Canadian competitiveness. To better understand productivity developments in Canada, it is useful to decompose total factor productivity (TFP) into investment-specific productivity change (ISP) and technologically neutral productivity change (TNP). The gap in manufacturing productivity growth between Canada and the United States originates mostly in the strong performance of specific industries, such as electrical products and commercial and industrial machinery
|