|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02446nmm a2200589 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000930519 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000724115 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781451963892
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Fieleke, Norman
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a International Capital Transactions
|b Should They Be Restricted?
|c Norman Fieleke
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 1993
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 42 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a Spain
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Interbank rates
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Interest rates
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Government and the Monetary System
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Payment Systems
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Finance
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Short-term Capital Movements
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Monetary economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Currency; Foreign exchange
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Regimes
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Financial services
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Current Account Adjustment
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Balance of payments
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Long-term Capital Movements
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Exports and Imports
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Money
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Capital flows
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Foreign Exchange
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Standards
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Capital controls
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Banks and Banking
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Currencies
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Monetary Systems
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Capital movements
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Exchange rates
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Money and Monetary Policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Foreign exchange
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International Investment
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Policy Discussion Papers
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451963892.003
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/003/1993/020/003.1993.issue-020-en.xml?cid=1478-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Some prominent economists and officials contend that government restrictions should be used to limit international capital movements that are considered destabilizing. This paper briefly summarizes the recent usage of such restrictions, discusses their international acceptance and their theoretical justification, reviews recent empirical studies of their efficacy, and examines their efficacy in Ireland, Spain, and Portugal during the latter part of 1992. The conclusion is that such restrictions typically have no more than fleeting and minor success in attaining their objectives
|