|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02330nmm a2200493 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000930240 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000723836 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781451842753
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Pension Reform in the Baltics, Russia, and other Countries of the Former Soviet Union (BRO)
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 1998
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 40 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a Kazakhstan, Republic of
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Population & demography
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Economics of the Handicapped
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Private Pensions
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Pension spending
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labour; income economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Retirement Policies
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Non-labor Market Discrimination
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Comparative Studies of Countries
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Social Security and Public Pensions
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Aging
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Economics of the Elderly
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Population aging
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Population and demographics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Expenditure
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Retirement
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Demography
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Pension reform
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Pensions
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public Finance
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451842753.001
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/1998/011/001.1998.issue-011-en.xml?cid=2504-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Despite their increasing fiscal burden, the public pension systems of BRO countries are failing to provide adequate social protection. Although there is a broad consensus about the need for pension reforms, BRO countries are debating whether to embark on systemic reforms or whether to correct the distortions in their pay-as-you-go (PAYG) pension systems. The paper reviews the measures taken by BRO countries during the transition period to address their pension problems and examines the options for further reform. It makes a strong case for a gradual reform approach aimed at establishing a multi-pillar system over the long run, but initially focused on implementation of “high-quality” reforms of the PAYG system
|