|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02162nmm a2200409 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000929649 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000723245 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781451856477
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Ramakrishnan, Uma
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Regional Economic Disparities in Australia
|c Uma Ramakrishnan, Martin Cerisola
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2004
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 23 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a Australia
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Income
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labour; income economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Unemployment
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Aggregate Factor Income Distribution
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Production; Economic theory
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics: Production
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor Economics: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Unemployment rate
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Production growth
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor economics
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Cerisola, Martin
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451856477.001
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2004/144/001.2004.issue-144-en.xml?cid=17615-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Australia's remarkable economic performance during the 1990s has not resulted in a significant convergence of real per capita income, output, and employment levels across the country's states and territories. This paper explores the role of certain economic rigidities that may have contributed to the lack of convergence, including rigidities in labor markets and in the structure of federal government transfers to households and subnational governments. The analysis suggests that the wage awards system has restricted the adjustment of real wages to productivity differentials, thus contributing to higher unemployment rates in some states. Federal government transfers to households also appear to have adversely affected work incentives in high unemployment states by limiting participation in the labor force
|