|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02494nmm a2200589 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000929200 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000722796 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781451848144
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Heller, Peter
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Rethinking Public Pension Reform Initiatives
|c Peter Heller
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 1998
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 30 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a Singapore
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Population & demography
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Finance, Public
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Income
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public-Private Enterprises
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Private Pensions
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Economics of the Handicapped
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Social assistance spending
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Pension spending
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Social Security and Public Pensions
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Non-labor Market Discrimination
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public Enterprises
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public sector
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Aggregate Factor Income Distribution
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Economics of the Elderly
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Aging
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a National accounts
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Population aging
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Population and demographics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Expenditure
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a National Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Demography
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Expenditures, Public
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Pensions
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Civil service & public sector
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public Finance
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451848144.001
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/1998/061/001.1998.issue-061-en.xml?cid=2582-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This paper argues that there are significant risks, limitations, and complications associated with reliance upon mandatory DC, fully funded schemes as the dominant public pension pillar. Policies to limit risks may result in the government being reinjected into playing an important financial role in the provision of social insurance. For many countries, the principal source of old age support should thus derive from a well-formulated, public DB pillar, with a significant amount of prefunding. A DC/FF pillar can play a useful supplemental role in a multi-pillar system for the accumulation of pension savings
|