|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02077nmm a2200433 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000929135 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000722731 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781451921717
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Tambakis, Demosthenes
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Monetary Policy with a Convex Phillips Curve and Asymmetric Loss
|c Demosthenes Tambakis
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 1998
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 28 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a United States
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Inflation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labour; income economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Monetary economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Monetary tightening
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Inflation targeting
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Deflation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Unemployment
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Price Level
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Prices
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Monetary policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Unemployment rate
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Monetary Policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Money and Monetary Policy
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451921717.001
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/1998/021/001.1998.issue-021-en.xml?cid=2516-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Recent theoretical and empirical work has cast doubt on the hypotheses of a linear Phillips curve and a symmetric quadratic loss function underlying traditional thinking on monetary policy. This paper analyzes the Barro-Gordon optimal monetary policy problem under alternative loss functions—including an asymmetric loss function corresponding to the “opportunistic approach” to disinflation—when the Phillips curve is convex. Numerical simulations are used to compare the implications of the alternative loss functions for equilibrium levels of inflation and unemployment. For parameter estimates relevant to the United States, the symmetric loss function dominates the asymmetric alternative
|