|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02211nmm a2200517 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000928520 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000722116 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781451841602
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Gerson, Philip
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a The Impact of Fiscal Policy Variables on Output Growth
|c Philip Gerson
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 1998
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 74 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a United States
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Income
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labour
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Production
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Aggregate Factor Income Distribution
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Demand and Supply of Labor: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a National accounts
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Expenditure
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics: Production
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor supply
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor Economics: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Expenditures, Public
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor market
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Economic theory
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public Finance
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Fiscal and Monetary Policy in Development
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Income economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Production growth
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor economics
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451841602.001
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/1998/001/001.1998.issue-001-en.xml?cid=2457-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This paper surveys the theoretical and empirical literature on the relationship between taxation and public expenditure and economic growth. Particular attention is paid to the effect of taxation and government expenditure on the supply and productivity of labor and physical capital. Studies suggest that well-targeted government expenditures on health, education, and infrastructure should have a positive impact on growth. By contrast, the impact of taxation on the supplies of labor and capital, and on output growth, is more muted
|