|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02190nmm a2200517 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000928190 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000721786 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781451875058
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Ueda, Kenichi
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Implications of Migrationon Income and Welfare of Nationals
|c Kenichi Ueda
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2002
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 31 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a New Zealand
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Migration
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Income
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Social security
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labour; income economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International Migration
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Taxes
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Migration, immigration & emigration
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Emigration and immigration
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Aggregate Factor Income Distribution
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a National accounts
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Welfare & benefit systems
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Population and demographics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Income and capital gains taxes
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Wages
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Taxation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Emigration and Immigration
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Income tax
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Social security contributions
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451875058.001
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2002/215/001.2002.issue-215-en.xml?cid=16179-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a As labor has become more mobile in today's world, it is important to understand the income and welfare of nationals regardless of their residence. This paper develops two key concepts, gross migration-corrected product (GMP) and welfare cost of migration, and calculates them using New Zealand data. Growth performance measured by New Zealanders' income has been clearly better than suggested by the GDP. The welfare cost associated with a marginal change in the tax rate appears quite high
|