|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02386nmm a2200565 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000927756 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000721352 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781455298730
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Virmani, Arvind
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a J-Curve of Productivity and Growth
|b Indian Manufacturing Post-Liberalization
|c Arvind Virmani, Danish Hashim
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2011
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 34 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a India
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Manufacturing industries
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labour
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Cross-Country Output Convergence
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Productivity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Aggregate Productivity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Cost
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Capital and Total Factor Productivity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Production
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Industrial productivity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Manufacturing
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Economic sectors
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Total factor productivity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Industry Studies: Manufacturing: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Industries: Manufacturing
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics: Production
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor Economics: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Measurement of Economic Growth
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Capacity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Economic theory
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Income economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Production growth
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Production and Operations Management
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor economics
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Hashim, Danish
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781455298730.001
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2011/163/001.2011.issue-163-en.xml?cid=25029-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Most estimates of Indian manufacturing productivity find a slowdown in the 1990s. This has puzzled analysts, given that 1990s reforms were deeper and wider than the 1980s reforms that raised the growth rate of the Indian economy by 2 per cent points. This paper tests the hypothesis of the J curve of Productivity and Growth following major liberalization and finds it to be broadly supported by the data: Technological obsolescence, gradual adoption of new technology and learning by doing result in negative effects on measured productivity
|