|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02544nmm a2200601 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000927049 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000720645 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781463902834
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Burundi
|b Ex Post Assessment of Longer-Term Program Engagement
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2011
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 44 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a Burundi
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Finance, Public
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Inflation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Debt relief
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Finance
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Farm produce
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Deflation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Debt Management
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Debt
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macrostructural analysis
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Exports and Imports
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Asset and liability management
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Agriculture: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Debts, External
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Sovereign Debt
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Expenditure
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Investments: Commodities
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Price Level
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Commodities
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Expenditures, Public
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Institutions and the Macroeconomy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public financial management (PFM)
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Agricultural commodities
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Investment & securities
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Financial Risk Management
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public Finance
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Structural reforms
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Staff Country Reports
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781463902834.002
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2011/269/002.2011.issue-269-en.xml?cid=25211-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Burundi’s extreme poverty, post-conflict environment, and persistent fragility created considerable risks to program implementation, calling for extensive flexibility in engagement. The program succeeded in establishing some of the key foundations of macroeconomic stability, mobilizing donor resources, and promoting poverty reduction. A successor program should strike the right balance between reforms narrowly aimed at improving the conduct of macroeconomic policies and other macro-critical reforms. Ensuring public debt sustainability should remain a key program objective. Risks to the new program are likely to remain high but manageable
|