|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02556nmm a2200541 u 4500 |
001 |
EB000926942 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000000720538 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
150128 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781451848762
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Cashin, Paul
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Internal Migration, Center-State Grants and Economic Growth in the States of India
|c Paul Cashin, Ratna Sahay
|
260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 1995
|
300 |
|
|
|a 56 pages
|
651 |
|
4 |
|a India
|
653 |
|
|
|a Population & demography
|
653 |
|
|
|a Migration
|
653 |
|
|
|a Public expenditure review
|
653 |
|
|
|a Income
|
653 |
|
|
|a Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, and Changes
|
653 |
|
|
|a Disposable income
|
653 |
|
|
|a Demographic Economics: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
653 |
|
|
|a International Migration
|
653 |
|
|
|a Personal income
|
653 |
|
|
|a Migration, immigration & emigration
|
653 |
|
|
|a Emigration and immigration
|
653 |
|
|
|a Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions
|
653 |
|
|
|a National accounts
|
653 |
|
|
|a National income
|
653 |
|
|
|a National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Population and demographics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Expenditure
|
653 |
|
|
|a Demography
|
653 |
|
|
|a Expenditures, Public
|
653 |
|
|
|a Population
|
653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Emigration and Immigration
|
653 |
|
|
|a Public Finance
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Sahay, Ratna
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451848762.001
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/1995/066/001.1995.issue-066-en.xml?cid=1919-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
520 |
|
|
|a This paper examines the growth experience of twenty states of India during the period 1961-91, using cross-sectional estimation and the analytical framework of the Solow-Swan neoclassical growth model. We find evidence of absolute convergence--initially-poor states did indeed grow faster than their initially-rich counterparts. There has also been a widening of the dispersion of real per capita state incomes over the period 1961-91. However, relatively more grants were transferred from the central government to the poor states than to their rich counterparts. Significant barriers to population flows also exist, as net migration from poor to rich states responded only weakly to cross-state income differentials
|