|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02339nmm a2200553 u 4500 |
001 |
EB000926739 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000000720335 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
150128 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781451839753
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Uzbekistan
|b Background Paper and Statistical Appendix
|
260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 1995
|
300 |
|
|
|a 101 pages
|
651 |
|
4 |
|a Uzbekistan, Republic of
|
653 |
|
|
|a Government and the Monetary System
|
653 |
|
|
|a Payment Systems
|
653 |
|
|
|a Credit
|
653 |
|
|
|a Farm produce
|
653 |
|
|
|a Regimes
|
653 |
|
|
|a Monetary economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Currency
|
653 |
|
|
|a Trade: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Exports and Imports
|
653 |
|
|
|a International economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Agriculture: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Money
|
653 |
|
|
|a Investments: Commodities
|
653 |
|
|
|a Foreign Exchange
|
653 |
|
|
|a Commodities
|
653 |
|
|
|a Standards
|
653 |
|
|
|a International trade
|
653 |
|
|
|a Exports
|
653 |
|
|
|a Currencies
|
653 |
|
|
|a Monetary Systems
|
653 |
|
|
|a Agricultural commodities
|
653 |
|
|
|a Investment & securities
|
653 |
|
|
|a Exchange rates
|
653 |
|
|
|a Money and Monetary Policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Foreign exchange
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a International Monetary Fund
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Staff Country Reports
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451839753.002
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/1995/023/002.1995.issue-023-en.xml?cid=500-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
520 |
|
|
|a This Background Paper and Statistical Appendix highlights that starting in 1994, financial policies in Uzbekistan were tightened so as to reduce inflation and stabilize the exchange rate in anticipation of the introduction of the new national currency, the sum. The Central Bank of Uzbekistan raised the interest rate on its rediscount credits several times and credit to loss-making state enterprises was curtailed. The average monthly rate of price increase fell from more than 22 percent in the first half of the year to less than 2 percent in the third quarter, partly in reflection of seasonal factors
|