|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02079nmm a2200433 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000925463 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000719059 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781451854329
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Ostry, Jonathan
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Does the Nominal Exchange Rate Regime Matter?
|c Jonathan Ostry, Anne Gulde, Atish Ghosh, Holger Wolf
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 1995
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 43 pages
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Inflation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International Monetary Arrangements and Institutions
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Exchange rate arrangements
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Deflation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Currency
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Economic Growth of Open Economies
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Price Level
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Foreign Exchange
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Conventional peg
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Exchange rate flexibility
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Prices
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Exchange rates
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Foreign exchange
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Ghosh, Atish
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Gulde, Anne
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Wolf, Holger
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451854329.001
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/1995/121/001.1995.issue-121-en.xml?cid=1980-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The effect of the exchange rate regime on inflation and growth is examined. The 30-year data set includes over 100 countries and nine regime types. Pegged regimes are associated with lower inflation than intermediate or flexible regimes. This anti-inflationary benefit reflects lower money supply growth (a discipline effect) and higher money demand growth (a credibility effect). Output growth does not vary significantly across regimes: Countries with pegged regimes invest more and are more open to international trade than those with flexible rates, but they experience lower residual productivity growth. Output and employment are more variable under pegged rates than under flexible rates
|