|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02467nmm a2200565 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000925440 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000719036 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781451963403
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Agricultural Trade and Protection in Asia
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 1988
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 34 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a Japan
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Agriculture and state
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Tariffs
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Tariff
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Agribusiness
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Agricultural Policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International Trade Organizations
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Farm produce
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Taxes
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Trade Policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Food Policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Trade: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Exports and Imports
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International economics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Economic sectors
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Agriculture: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Investments: Commodities
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Commodities
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Commercial policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International trade
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Trade barriers
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Agricultural commodities
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Investment & securities
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Agricultural policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Taxation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Imports
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Agricultural law
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451963403.001
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/1988/063/001.1988.issue-063-en.xml?cid=29753-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The study reveals agricultural import restrictions are widely applied in Asia, but that Japan and Korea impose lower average tariffs and nontariff barriers with less frequency than most Asian countries. It also finds several low and middle-income countries enforce relatively low protection for basic foodstuffs, while high-income countries tend to impose relatively high protection for foods. Finally, commodity patterns of trade and protection suggest scope exists for successful reciprocal negotiations to liberalize agricultural trade mainly between low and middle-income Asian countries. Though similar gains might be achieved by unilateral liberalization, reciprocal negotiations are more feasible politically and, on a most-favored-nation basis, would imply greater trade expansion
|