|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02318nmm a2200529 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000924886 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000718482 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781451951035
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a A Noteon the Public Choice Approach to the Growth in Government Expenditure
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 1988
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 25 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a United States
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Civil service
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Finance, Public
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Income
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public-Private Enterprises
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Total expenditures
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public Enterprises
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public sector
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Aggregate Labor Productivity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Unemployment
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Aggregate Factor Income Distribution
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Economic sectors
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Aggregate Human Capital
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a National accounts
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Labor
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Expenditure
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Expenditures, Public
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Civil service & public sector
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Wages
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Intergenerational Income Distribution
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public Finance
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Employment
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451951035.001
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/1988/093/001.1988.issue-093-en.xml?cid=28562-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The paper applies an empirical model, based on the economic theory of public choice, to the Group of Seven countries. It is discovered: (a) that deficit financing does appear to contribute to increased real government spending; (b) that the demand for government services as a whole does not appear to be income elastic; (c) that there is some evidence of a productivity lag in the government sectors of Canada, Japan, and the United States, but not those of France, Italy, or the United Kingdom; and (d) that in most countries there is some evidence of economies of scale in the provision of government services
|