|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02753nmm a2200577 u 4500 |
001 |
EB000924579 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000000718175 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
150128 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781475552942
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Keen, Michael
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Coordinating Climate and Trade Policies
|b Pareto Efficiency and the Role of Border Tax Adjustments
|c Michael Keen, Christos Kotsogiannis
|
260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2012
|
300 |
|
|
|a 26 pages
|
651 |
|
4 |
|a United States
|
653 |
|
|
|a Environmental Economics: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Environmental Policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Tariff
|
653 |
|
|
|a Tariffs
|
653 |
|
|
|a Environmental policy & protocols
|
653 |
|
|
|a International Trade Organizations
|
653 |
|
|
|a Environmental Economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Environmental economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Taxes
|
653 |
|
|
|a Environmental impact charges
|
653 |
|
|
|a Environment
|
653 |
|
|
|a Trade Policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
|
653 |
|
|
|a Carbon tax
|
653 |
|
|
|a Climate policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Environmental Economics: Government Policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Business Taxes and Subsidies
|
653 |
|
|
|a Trade and Environment
|
653 |
|
|
|a Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Emissions trading
|
653 |
|
|
|a Taxation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Taxation and Subsidies: Externalities
|
653 |
|
|
|a Value-added tax
|
653 |
|
|
|a Spendings tax
|
653 |
|
|
|a Redistributive Effects
|
653 |
|
|
|a Environmental policy
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Kotsogiannis, Christos
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781475552942.001
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2012/289/001.2012.issue-289-en.xml?cid=40153-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
520 |
|
|
|a This paper explores the role of trade instruments in globally efficient climate policies, focusing on the central issue of whether some form of border tax adjustment (BTA) is warranted when carbon prices differ internationally. It shows that tariff policy has a role in easing cross-country distributional concerns that can make non-uniform carbon pricing efficient and, more particularly, that Pareto-efficiency requires a form of BTA when carbon taxes in some countries are constrained, a special case being identified in which this has the simple structure envisaged in practical policy discusions. It also stresses—a point that has been overlooked in the policy debate—that the efficiency case for BTA depends critically on whether climate policies are pursued by carbon taxation or by cap-and-trade
|