|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02631nmm a2200601 u 4500 |
001 |
EB000924135 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000000717731 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
150128 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781484338483
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Senegal
|b Fifth Review Under the Policy Support Instrument and Request for Program Extension and Modification of Assessment Criteria—Staff Report; Debt Sustainability Analysis; Informational Annex; and Press Release
|
260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2013
|
300 |
|
|
|a 75 pages
|
651 |
|
4 |
|a Senegal
|
653 |
|
|
|a Finance, Public
|
653 |
|
|
|a Public debt
|
653 |
|
|
|a Investment
|
653 |
|
|
|a Finance
|
653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Government debt management
|
653 |
|
|
|a Debt Management
|
653 |
|
|
|a Debts, Public
|
653 |
|
|
|a Debt
|
653 |
|
|
|a Exports and Imports
|
653 |
|
|
|a Intangible Capital
|
653 |
|
|
|a International economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a International Lending and Debt Problems
|
653 |
|
|
|a Debts, External
|
653 |
|
|
|a External debt
|
653 |
|
|
|a National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Expenditure
|
653 |
|
|
|a Sovereign Debt
|
653 |
|
|
|a Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Investments: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Expenditures, Public
|
653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Public financial management (PFM)
|
653 |
|
|
|a Capacity
|
653 |
|
|
|a Budgeting & financial management
|
653 |
|
|
|a National Budget, Deficit, and Debt: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Capital
|
653 |
|
|
|a Public Finance
|
653 |
|
|
|a Finance: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Revenue
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a International Monetary Fund
|b African Dept
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Staff Country Reports
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781484338483.002
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2013/170/002.2013.issue-170-en.xml?cid=40700-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
520 |
|
|
|a Program implementation has been satisfactory, and all assessment criteria were met. The fiscal deficit was reduced to 5.9 percent of GDP despite a significant revenue shortfall. Delays were incurred in the implementation of reforms in the energy sector. The authorities intend to accelerate reforms to improve the business environment by streamlining expenditure and by improving the efficiency of the state to reduce the fiscal deficit to below 4 percent of GDP by 2015. This will restore fiscal buffers and ensure long-term debt sustainability
|