|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02591nmm a2200661 u 4500 |
001 |
EB000923871 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000000717467 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
150128 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781484383230
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Roache, Shaun
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Unconventional Monetary Policy and Asset Price Risk
|c Shaun Roache, Marina Rousset
|
260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2013
|
300 |
|
|
|a 26 pages
|
651 |
|
4 |
|a United States
|
653 |
|
|
|a Finance
|
653 |
|
|
|a Currency; Foreign exchange
|
653 |
|
|
|a Deflation
|
653 |
|
|
|a option pricing
|
653 |
|
|
|a Unconventional monetary policies
|
653 |
|
|
|a Asset prices
|
653 |
|
|
|a Futures Pricing
|
653 |
|
|
|a Foreign Exchange
|
653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Event Studies
|
653 |
|
|
|a Futures
|
653 |
|
|
|a Foreign exchange
|
653 |
|
|
|a Commodity Markets
|
653 |
|
|
|a Inflation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Institutional Investors
|
653 |
|
|
|a Pension Funds
|
653 |
|
|
|a Investments: Futures
|
653 |
|
|
|a Monetary economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Financial institutions
|
653 |
|
|
|a Contingent Pricing
|
653 |
|
|
|a Financial Instruments
|
653 |
|
|
|a Options
|
653 |
|
|
|a Investments: Options
|
653 |
|
|
|a Derivative securities
|
653 |
|
|
|a Price Level
|
653 |
|
|
|a Non-bank Financial Institutions
|
653 |
|
|
|a Prices
|
653 |
|
|
|a Commodity prices
|
653 |
|
|
|a Monetary policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Central Banks and Their Policies
|
653 |
|
|
|a Information and Market Efficiency
|
653 |
|
|
|a Exchange rates
|
653 |
|
|
|a Monetary Policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Money and Monetary Policy
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Rousset, Marina
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781484383230.001
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2013/190/001.2013.issue-190-en.xml?cid=40914-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
520 |
|
|
|a We examine the effects of unconventional monetary policy (UMP) events in the United States on asset price risk using risk-neutral density functions estimated from options prices. Based on an event study including a key exchange rate, an equity index, and five commodities, we find that “tail risk” diminishes in the immediate aftermath of UMP events, particularly downside left tail risk. We also find that QE1 and QE3 had stronger effects than QE2. We conclude that UMP events that serve to ease policies can help to bolster market confidence in times of high uncertainty
|