|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02580nmm a2200529 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000923855 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000717451 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
150128 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781484339787
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a India
|b Financial Sector Assessment Program—Detailed Assessments Report on Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2013
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 87 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a India
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Financial institutions
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Value of Firms
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Depository Institutions
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Market risk
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Asset requirements
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Banks
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Micro Finance Institutions
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Banking
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Financial Risk and Risk Management
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Financial Institutions and Services: Government Policy and Regulation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Banks and banking
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Mortgages
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Financing Policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Capital adequacy requirements
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Financial services law & regulation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Banks and Banking
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a State supervision
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Bank supervision
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Commercial banks
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Financial risk management
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Financial regulation and supervision
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Goodwill
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Capital and Ownership Structure
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Operational risk
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a International Monetary Fund
|b Monetary and Capital Markets Department
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Staff Country Reports
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781484339787.002
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2013/267/002.2013.issue-267-en.xml?cid=40891-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This paper discusses the findings of the assessments on Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision in India. The Reserve Bank of India is to be commended for its tightly controlled regulatory and supervisory regime, consisting of higher than minimum capital requirements; frequent, hands-on, and comprehensive onsite inspections; and a conservative liquidity risk policy and restrictions on banks’ capacity to take on more volatile exposures. Despite this strong performance, several gaps and constraints in the implementation of the regulatory and supervision framework remain. The most significant gaps are in the area of international and, to a lesser extent, domestic supervisory information sharing and cooperation
|