|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02571nmm a2200301 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000738306 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000589738 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
140413 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780511793769
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a JN96.A91
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Stroschein, Sherrill
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Ethnic struggle, coexistence, and democratization in Eastern Europe
|c Sherrill Stroschein
|
| 246 |
3 |
1 |
|a Ethnic Struggle, Coexistence, & Democratization in Eastern Europe
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Cambridge
|b Cambridge University Press
|c 2012
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a xxiv, 289 pages
|b digital
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a 1. Ethnic protest, moderation, and democratization -- 2. Time, process, and events in democratization -- 3. Ethnic contention in context -- 4. Local violence and uncertainty in Târgul Mureș, 1990 -- 5. The power of symbols: Romanians, Hungarians, and King Mathias in Cluj -- 6. Forging language laws: schools and sign wars -- 7. Debating local governance: autonomy, local control, and minority enclaves -- 8. Implications of group interaction
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a Europe, Eastern / Ethnic relations
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Democratization / Europe, Eastern
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Ethnic groups / Political activity / Europe, Eastern
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Minorities / Political activity / Europe, Eastern
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b CBO
|a Cambridge Books Online
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a Cambridge studies in contentious politics
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511793769
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 320.947
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a In societies divided on ethnic and religious lines, problems of democracy are magnified - particularly where groups are mobilized into parties. With the principle of majority rule, minorities should be less willing to endorse democratic institutions where their parties persistently lose elections. While such problems should also hamper transitions to democracy, several diverse Eastern European states have formed democracies even under these conditions. In this book, Sherrill Stroschein argues that sustained protest and contention by ethnic Hungarians in Romania and Slovakia brought concessions on policies that they could not achieve through the ballot box, in contrast to Transcarpathia, Ukraine. In Romania and Slovakia, contention during the 1990s made each group accustomed to each other's claims and aware of the degree to which each could push its own. Ethnic contention became a de facto deliberative process that fostered a moderation of group stances, allowing democratic consolidation to slowly and organically take root
|