Mitigation and aggravation at sentencing

This innovative volume explores a fundamental issue in the field of sentencing: the factors which make a sentence more or less severe. All sentencing systems allow courts discretion to consider mitigating and aggravating factors, and many legislatures have placed a number of such factors on a statut...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Roberts, Julian V. (Editor)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2011
Series:Cambridge studies in law and society
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Cambridge Books Online - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 01907nmm a2200253 u 4500
001 EB000737459
003 EBX01000000000000000588891
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 140413 ||| eng
020 |a 9780511979170 
050 4 |a KD8406.A75 
100 1 |a Roberts, Julian V.  |e [editor] 
245 0 0 |a Mitigation and aggravation at sentencing  |c edited by Julian V. Roberts 
246 3 1 |a Mitigation & Aggravation at Sentencing 
260 |a Cambridge  |b Cambridge University Press  |c 2011 
300 |a xvii, 285 pages  |b digital 
653 |a Sentences (Criminal procedure) / England / Congresses 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b CBO  |a Cambridge Books Online 
490 0 |a Cambridge studies in law and society 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511979170  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 345.420772 
520 |a This innovative volume explores a fundamental issue in the field of sentencing: the factors which make a sentence more or less severe. All sentencing systems allow courts discretion to consider mitigating and aggravating factors, and many legislatures have placed a number of such factors on a statutory footing. Yet many questions remain regarding the theory and practice of mitigation and aggravation. Drawing on legal and sociological perspectives and examining mitigation and aggravation in various jurisdictions, the essays provide practical illustrations of specific factors as well as theoretical justifications. After the foreword by Andrew von Hirsch, a number of contributors address broad conceptual issues raised at sentencing. These contributions are followed by several empirical chapters including an exploration of personal mitigation in English courts. The authors are leading scholars from a range of common law jurisdictions including England and Wales, the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa