|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02173nmm a2200313 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000736353 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000587785 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
140311 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9004232672
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9789004232679
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9789004232662
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Sevastik, Per
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Aspects of sovereignty
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b Sino-Swedish reflections
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Leiden
|b Brill
|c 2013, 2013
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (198 p.)
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a then and now -- 2. Some aspects on the effects of human rights law and its implications on international law -- 3. Sovereignty and transnational investments -- 4. Regional integration and sovereignty : the sum is more than its parts? -- 5. Hong Kong's sub-sovereign status and its external relations -- 6. Intertwined sovereignties and the problem of legitimate opposition in the European Union -- 7. The horizontal state : states and agencies in a world without boundaries -- 8. The end of state sovereignty? -- From a Chinese perspective
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International law / China
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International law / Sweden
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Sovereignty
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b BRL
|a Brill Nijhoff E-Books Collections 2009-2014
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a The Raoul Wallenberg Institute Human Rights Library
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Description based upon print version of record. - Includes index
|
| 024 |
8 |
|
|a 10.1163/9789004232679
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004232679?nosfx=y
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 320.15
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The overall objective of this unique volume is to understand what effects globalisation has had on the traditional views of sovereignty, seen from aChinese and European, primarily Swedish, perspective. Does the cultural-historical approach have any value in China today or is it only seenas political reminiscence with very little real effects in the wake of globalisation? What are the differences between different understandings ofsovereignty in different parts of the world? How has the concept changed generally because of a different international structure, with for exampleregional integratio
|