By parallel reasoning the construction and evaluation of analogical arguments

In this work, Paul Bartha proposes a normative theory of analogical arguments and raises questions and proposes answers regarding the criteria for evaluating analogical arguments, the philosophical justification for analogical reasoning, and the place of scientific analogies in the context of theore...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bartha, Paul F. A.
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: New York Oxford University Press 2010, 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Oxford University Press - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 01252nmm a2200277 u 4500
001 EB000727389
003 EBX01000000000000000580471
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 180413 ||| eng
020 |a 9780199776313 
020 |a 0199776318 
050 4 |a BD190 
100 1 |a Bartha, Paul F. A. 
245 0 0 |a By parallel reasoning  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b the construction and evaluation of analogical arguments  |c Paul F.A. Bartha 
260 |a New York  |b Oxford University Press  |c 2010, 2010 
300 |a xiv, 356 p. 
505 0 |a Includes bibliographical references and index 
653 |a Analogy 
653 |a Reasoning 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b OUP  |a Oxford University Press 
028 5 0 |a 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195325539.001.0001 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195325539.001.0001?nosfx=y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 169 
520 |a In this work, Paul Bartha proposes a normative theory of analogical arguments and raises questions and proposes answers regarding the criteria for evaluating analogical arguments, the philosophical justification for analogical reasoning, and the place of scientific analogies in the context of theoretical confirmation